Back to Search
Journal ArticleOpen Access

Early Prediction for Merged vs Abandoned Code Changes in Modern Code Reviews

Author Affiliations
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, University of California, Davis, University of Calgary
Published InarXiv (Cornell University)
Year2019
Citations23

Abstract

The modern code review process is an integral part of the current software development practice. Considerable effort is given here to inspect code changes, find defects, suggest an improvement, and address the suggestions of the reviewers. In a code review process, usually, several iterations take place where an author submits code changes and a reviewer gives feedback until is happy to accept the change. In around 12% cases, the changes are abandoned, eventually wasting all the efforts. In this research, our objective is to design a tool that can predict whether a code change would be merged or abandoned at an early stage to reduce the waste of efforts of all stakeholders (e.g., program author, reviewer, project management, etc.) involved.…
View at Publisher

BORR does not host full-text PDFs. The button above takes you to the original publisher.