Back to Search
Journal ArticleOpen Access

Implications for quantifying early life growth trajectories of term‐born infants using INTERGROWTH‐21st newborn size standards at birth in conjunction with World Health Organization child growth standards in the postnatal period

Author Affiliations
Hospital for Sick Children, Centre for Global Health Research, SickKids Foundation, Harvard Global Health Institute, ...
Published InPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Year2022
Citations8

Abstract

Abstract Background The INTERGROWTH‐21st sex and gestational age (GA) specific newborn size standards (IG‐NS) are intended to complement the World Health Organization Child Growth Standards (WHO‐GS), which are not GA‐specific. We examined the implications of using IG‐NS at birth and WHO‐GS at postnatal ages in longitudinal epidemiologic studies. Objectives The aim of this study was to quantify the extent to which standardised measures of newborn size and growth are affected when using WHO‐GS versus IG‐NS at birth among term‐born infants. Methods Data from two prenatal trials in Bangladesh ( n = 755) and The Gambia ( n = 522) were used to estimate and compare size at birth and growth from birth to 3 months when using WHO‐GS only (‘WHO‐GS’)…
View at Publisher

BORR does not host full-text PDFs. The button above takes you to the original publisher.