Back to Search
Journal ArticleOpen Access

Accurate characterization of wildlife trade and policy instruments: Reply to D'Cruze et al. (2022) and Frank and Wilcove (2022)

Author Affiliations
University of Oxford, University of Sheffield, Zoological Society of London, International Union for Conservation of Nature (Bangladesh), ...
Published InConservation Letters
Year2022
Citations3

Abstract

D'Cruze et al. (2022) and Frank and Wilcove (2022) suggest that Challender et al. (2021) misrepresent their research. We reiterate that our intention was not to denigrate any particular study; instead, we aimed to draw attention to contemporary issues in wildlife trade research and highlight ways for research to better inform policy processes. Here, we respond to the points raised in these articles. D'Cruze et al. suggest that we were incorrect to deduce from Harrington et al. (2019) that their position is that “use/trade [in Asian otters as exotic pets] constitutes a threat to the species or is detrimental to wild populations.” This is despite the title of that article being “Popularity of pet otters on YouTube: evidence of an…
View at Publisher

BORR does not host full-text PDFs. The button above takes you to the original publisher.