ReviewUnknown
Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Standard Oxygen Therapy or Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Children with Respiratory Distress: A Meta-Analysis
Authors
Author Affiliations
Sichuan University, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, ...
Published InThe Journal of Pediatrics
Year2019
Citations68
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in providing respiratory support of children with acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI), hypoxemia, and respiratory distress. STUDY DESIGN We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared HFNC and standard flow oxygen therapy or nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and reported treatment failure as an outcome. Data were synthesized using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS Compared with standard oxygen therapy, HFNC significantly reduced treatment failure (risk ratio [RR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.40-0.60, P 90% on room air). HFNC had an increased risk of treatment failure compared with nCPAP in infants age 1-6 months with severe hypoxemia (SpO2 90% on supplemental oxygen) (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.17-2.67, P…
View at Publisher
BORR does not host full-text PDFs. The button above takes you to the original publisher.