BORRBangladesh Open Research Repository
SearchSubmitAboutContact
BORRResearch for a Better Bangladesh.
AboutSubmit PaperContactTermsPolicyGitHub

© 2026 Bangladesh Open Research Repository.

Filters

Sort By

Sort by relevanceSort by dateSort by citations
Year Range
to

Results for “"David Moher"”

5 results

Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison

Verified

Larissa Shamseer, David Moher, Onyi Maduekwe, Lucy Turner et al.

Journal: BMC MedicineYear: 2017Citations: 384

BACKGROUND: The Internet has transformed scholarly publishing, most notably, by the introduction of open access publishing. Recently, there has been a rise of online journals characterized as 'predatory', which actively solicit manuscripts and charge publications fees without providing robust peer r...

Social SciencesDecision SciencesStatistics, Probability and UncertaintyOpen Access
Read Source

Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 Reporting Guideline: the Perspectives of Systematic Review Authors

Verified

Belinda Burford, Vivian Welch, Elizabeth Waters, Peter Tugwell et al.

Journal: PLoS ONEYear: 2013Citations: 40

Reporting guidelines can be used to encourage standardised and comprehensive reporting of health research. In light of the global commitment to health equity, we have previously developed and published a reporting guideline for equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012). The objectives of thi...

Social SciencesDecision SciencesStatistics, Probability and UncertaintyOpen Access
Read Source

Measuring the Performance of the Cochrane Library

Verified

Lisa Bero, Godwin Busuttil, Cindy Farquhar, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos et al.

Journal: Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsYear: 2012Citations: 27

How well does The Cochrane Library achieve its objectiveto provide accessible and credible evidence to guide decision making in medicine and public health?And how should we measure success or failure?Regular users of The Cochrane Library will have a view of its quality, and we hope that you think th...

Social SciencesDecision SciencesStatistics, Probability and UncertaintyOpen Access
Read Source

The People’s Review protocol: planning an innovative study powered by the public

Verified

Éle Quinn, Shoba Dawson, Jeremy Holt, Shahed Hossain et al.

Journal: Research Involvement and EngagementYear: 2025Citations: 3

Systematic reviews provide the best quality evidence about the effectiveness of health treatments. However, systematic reviews and the important role they play in healthcare are not well understood beyond the walls of academia and healthcare. Systematic reviews can help the public make more informed...

Social SciencesDecision SciencesStatistics, Probability and UncertaintyOpen Access
Read Source

Rise of the predators: Business is booming in the murky global market of suspect and sham publishers and journals

Verified

Bryn Nelson

Journal: Cancer CytopathologyYear: 2016Citations: 2

This is Part 1 of a 3-part series on the origins, impacts, and opponents of predatory journals. One Russian-owned journal that may or may not be based in Warsaw, Poland, appears to have a fake editorial board and a bogus impact factor. Another publisher and prolifi c spammer with a posted address in...

Social SciencesDecision SciencesStatistics, Probability and UncertaintyOpen Access
Read Source
PreviousPage 1 of 1Next