ReviewOpen Access
Predator control should not be a shot in the dark
Authors
Author Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Educational Centre Ljubljana, ...
Published InFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Year2016
Citations264
Abstract
Livestock owners traditionally use various non‐lethal and lethal methods to protect their domestic animals from wild predators. However, many of these methods are implemented without first considering experimental evidence of their effectiveness in mitigating predation‐related threats or avoiding ecological degradation. To inform future policy and research on predators, we systematically evaluated evidence for interventions against carnivore (canid, felid, and ursid) predation on livestock in North American and European farms. We also reviewed a selection of tests from other continents to help assess the global generality of our findings. Twelve published tests – representing five non‐lethal methods and 7 lethal methods – met the accepted standard of scientific inference (random assignment or quasi‐experimental case‐control) without bias in sampling, treatment, measurement, or…
View at Publisher
BORR does not host full-text PDFs. The button above takes you to the original publisher.